Sheila
Gold Member
- 5,375
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Becca_in_MD said:The link is very interesting to read, even if you're not interested in the dispute between PC and PL. The info given on turn-over, retention, etc. for PC and the industry is fascinating.
.
Ha! Maybe it's been two years since some of the bigwigs left. And now they're out outside of the 2 year non-solicitation clause! Lol. Just kidding.But I guess that's not accurate since Jean's email seems to speak to current directors, obviously.bethcooks4u said:I don't understand why they are coming after our leaders again. Yes, I know they won the suit but really?!
cookingwithlove said:Melissa correct me if I am wrong, but essentially PC lost the suit. Our Nonsolicitation clause was not upheld as we are independent and our turn over rate is so large. I know there is more to it.
Regardless... What Park Lane does may not be illegal, but I think it is unethical. I was so disappointed in DF's behavior and his leaving PC. I think he left shortly after earning the hospitality award. Curious, did he know he was leaving so opened hospitality to everyone?
bethcooks4u said:One of my downline has jewelry parties all the time for a couple of the companies and she's always talking about how much better our benefits are especially for hosts. She had a really good party and got a lot of free jewelry but could hardly afford the tax and shipping on her "free" items. She also said that the consultant doesn't always give all the host benefits so evidently she has to pay for them. It sounded shady to me. Danielle has stated many times that the PC party I did for her was the first DS party she ever did and is shocked that other companies give so much less to their customers/hosts/consultants.
cookingwithlove said:Melissa correct me if I am wrong, but essentially PC lost the suit. Our Nonsolicitation clause was not upheld as we are independent and our turn over rate is so large. I know there is more to it.
Regardless... What Park Lane does may not be illegal, but I think it is unethical. I was so disappointed in DF's behavior and his leaving PC. I think he left shortly after earning the hospitality award. Curious, did he know he was leaving so opened hospitality to everyone?
cincychef said:It is very unethical and I would have trouble switching to a company that would use unethical means to recruit me, how would you build a team and grow your business?
pamperedbecky said:Ha! Maybe it's been two years since some of the bigwigs left. And now they're out outside of the 2 year non-solicitation clause! Lol. Just kidding.
But I guess that's not accurate since Jean's email seems to speak to current directors, obviously.
DebChefIA said:That is exactly what is going on. The 2 years is up and now they have called EVERY NED, SED and Exec and are starting to work down the the lowly Senior Directors like me.
Apparently DF admited on a conference call last week with one of his former PC cronies that he only made $52,000 with PL last year. Yikes!!
DebChefIA said:That is exactly what is going on. The 2 years is up and now they have called EVERY NED, SED and Exec and are starting to work down the the lowly Senior Directors like me.
Apparently DF admited on a conference call last week with one of his former PC cronies that he only made $52,000 with PL last year. Yikes!!
cincychef said:I have had a few parties here and there for other companies, including jewelry, skin care, and toys and with all of them I was shocked at how much I had to pay for my "FREE" product. PC really does the best job with host rewards and honestly I think we don't advertise it enough.
pamperedbecky said:What I have the biggest issue with is the former Pampered Chef Directors and upper level Directors going there and actively recruiting their former teams and other consultants. They not only should have know this was unethical because it was going against an agreement they signed, BUT there was a similar issue with a former male consultant years ago who did the same thing when he went to an entirely different direct sales company and was terminated because of actively recruiting PC consultants at conference (if I'm not mistaken). They would have been aware of this I'm sure. I just don't think these successful directors could plead ignorance and that's what irks me. That's what is unethical.
As for PL actively recruiting our successful consultants, it would be fine if it was on their own, but these examples seem to be because they got the various names from former PC Directors. And I think the warning in Jean's email today seemed to reference the "structure" of any companies people may explore. We take the time and effort to grow our teams and she seemed to reference how at this company, people can just come in at a higher level and have ready-made teams without necessarily doing the work to get there. It does speak to the overall integrity of a company.
I don't know - everyone is entitled to go where they want for the reasons they want. It just leaves a bad taste in my mouth in this particular instance.
cookingwithlove said:I was so disappointed in DF's behavior and his leaving PC.
bethcooks4u said:And you remembered exactly right about that other male consultant. He was openly recruiting on the elevator at conference at which he had gotten big recognition for his achievements with PC.
finley1991 said:I'm a little late joining this discussion but years ago when TOHE started, they tried to poach directors from PC (because a few execs left to go with them... and ironically they are now out of biz and merged with another company that was going out of biz). They did it through the lead pool. They knew that HO leads were funneled out to Directors so they just started plugging in zip codes and contacting directors that way.
bethcooks4u said:You hit the nail on the head. And you remembered exactly right about that other male consultant. He was openly recruiting on the elevator at conference at which he had gotten big recognition for his achievements with PC.
baychef said:This is what made me extremely disgusted and distrustful of DF. A leader we looked up to and an inspiration so blatenly defying a company. A company that honored him and had him on committies that made many decisions for all of us.
Chef Karen said:So, why are these "fools" leaving? When you are with the best, why would you go work for someone else especially a company that is lacking in integrity?????
The email in question is a communication from Jewels by Park Lane, a direct sales company that sells jewelry, to Pampered Chef Directors. It is causing concern because it appears to be encouraging PC Directors to leave their current company and join Jewels by Park Lane.
It is unclear if Jewels by Park Lane is actively trying to recruit Pampered Chef Directors. However, the email in question does seem to suggest that they are interested in having PC Directors join their company.
There could be a variety of reasons why Jewels by Park Lane would want Pampered Chef Directors to leave their company. It could be for strategic business purposes, to gain new talent and experience, or to expand their reach into different markets.
Pampered Chef has not officially responded to this situation. However, the email has caused quite a stir among the Pampered Chef community, with many Directors expressing their anger and disappointment at the possibility of being poached by another company.
There is no confirmed information about Jewels by Park Lane offering higher incentives for Pampered Chef Directors to join their company. At this time, it is just speculation. However, if this is true, it would certainly be a cause for concern among Pampered Chef Directors and the company as a whole.